The short answer is no: God expects for everybody on the planet to submit to Christ under the New Covenant, which does exclude the Law of Moses, however it imparts to Moses central virtues in light of the fact that both depend on the perpetual character of God Himself (contrast Leviticus 19:1-2 and Matthew 5:48 and Luke 6:36). To go further than the surface, we need to take a gander at what Jeremiah, Jesus, Paul, and the creator of Hebrews say about the old and new pledges. Hensley Legal Group
Prescience of the New Covenant
Around 600 years before Christ, the prophet Jeremiah anticipated the new contract (Jeremiah 31:31-34). He said the new contract would be not the same as the old (determined as the one God made with the places o
f Israel and Judah when he delivered them once again from Egypt- – unquestionably alluding to the Mosaic Covenant). This time, the laws would be composed on individuals’ souls, every one of them will know the LORD, and He will totally excuse them. The New Testament book of Hebrews says this is the agreement Christ presented (Hebrews 8:7-13 and 10:15-18, on which more is said underneath).
Unique subjects of the Law of Moses
As per the Hebrew Scriptures (what Christians call the Old Testament), the Law of Moses comprised the pledge God made with the Israelites. Its ethical code, ministry, celebrations and other uncommon days, and conciliatory framework were completely intended for the Hebrew country. Fundamental for the contract the Israelites settled on with God was their consent to submit to the specifications of the Law of Moses and to turn into the objects of its gifts on the off chance that they complied and its condemnations on the off chance that they resisted. As initially conveyed, no other country was called upon or expected to keep the Law of Moses. As indicated by Jewish custom, the remainder of the countries of the world were as yet under the contract God made with Noah.
What change, assuming any, occurred when the New Covenant went along? How could it influence the use of the Old? Did it take what make widespread what once applied distinctly to the Israelites? Or on the other hand did it invalidate the Old Covenant so it not, at this point applied in any event, for the country of Israel?
Jesus’ instructing about the Law of Moses
As indicated by Galatians 4:4, Jesus was “brought into the world under the Law,” which evidently implies that He will undoubtedly comply with the Law’s edicts and statutes. As an Israelite, He was similarly as committed to keep the Law as each and every other Israelite. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:17-18), He rejects that His motivation is to “cancel” the Law and the Prophets. The Greek word deciphered “annul” (kataluo) is “annihilate” with a heightening prepositional prefix, signifying “completely obliterate.” Rather, He says, His motivation is to satisfy the Law, and He says paradise and earth would sooner vanish than the Law, until everything is satisfied. He says that the individual breaking or encouraging others to break the least of the edicts will be called least in the realm of paradise, while the individuals who practice and train its rules will be called extraordinary in the realm of paradise (Matthew 5:19).